Listening to Luke 16: 19 -31
Lazarus Speaks
Lazarus Speaks
This parable consists of three characters, rich man,
Lazarus and Abraham and not to deny a narrator of this story. Most of the
talking in this parable is done by the rich man and Abraham, with some
interventions of the narrator. It is interesting and surprising to note that in
the whole of the parable not a single word of Lazarus is recorded, for Lazarus’
voice has been conspicuously silenced. It was the rich man who silenced Lazarus’
voice before death, and later it was Abraham who shadowed Lazarus and silenced
his voice. Lazarus has been forced into speechlessness by the conditions around
him in this entire narration. His poverty, his hunger, his homelessness, his
powerlessness, his not being ‘famous’ in the society, his wounded self and psyche
all paved to his (non)being as non-person, non-identity and non-public pushing
him into the mode of speechlessness.
In such a context, the text challenges to employ a ‘decolonized
hermeneutics’ to recover the voice and speech of Lazarus, thereby uphold the
worth and value of his life, both before and after death. Can the subaltern
speak? Yes, the subaltern can speak, for those that have ears will listen to
their narratives.
“When we were dying out of hunger and poverty, here is a rich man who
was insensitive to the needs of the people around him and lived a complacent
selfish life in pomp and pleasure” remembered Lazarus who was at his deathbed
due to a terminal ailment, for he lived as a homeless person at the gates of
this rich man’s villa fed on the crumbs of this man along with dogs, for the
dogs even licked his wounds.
Few days later Lazarus died, and since he was an outcast, no one came
forward to bury his polluted corpse, leaving it to decompose without a burial. But fortunately, the
angels carried Lazarus to be with God, where Abraham also found a refuge.
Afterwards the rich man also died, for tens and thousands of rich people came
to his ceremonial funeral service paying tributes to him, praising him for what
he was not.
Eventually rich man was taken to Hades, where he was tormented, a price
for his being rich and for creating poor around him. He looked up, saw Abraham
at God’s place and was startled to see Lazarus by his side. “Can a dog licking
wounded, homeless, poor ‘slum dog’ be at the side of Abraham, the father of the
faithful?” exclaimed the once upon a time rich man. (For in the kingdom of God,
rich man’s position is reversed.)
If Lazarus spoke in this text, all the evil things the
rich man did towards the poor and homeless people would have been revealed, all
the evil things that the rich man did to become even more richer by making the
poor poorer would have been exposed. If Lazarus spoke, he would have narrated
how he was pushed by the rich empire into poverty, homelessness and hunger. If
Lazarus spoke, he would have testified what an impossibility it would have been
for the rich to enter the kingdom of heaven. If Lazarus spoke, he would have
disclosed that the real meaning of life is in sharing and caring for one
another, for life cannot be quantified into monetary terms and conditions.
If Lazarus spoke, he would have said emphasized on the
spirituality of dispossession, where each individual is called to give up
greed and bridge the gap between rich and poor by identifying with the poor. If
Lazarus spoke, he would have said, look for the divine among the poor, for
theirs is the kingdom of God. If Lazarus spoke, he would have called to practice
what has been preached by Moses and the prophets. If Lazarus spoke, he would
have emphasized that being grounded in one’s faith traditions like Moses or
Prophet(s) makes the them to be inclusive, faithful and tolerant in looking for
truths in other faith traditions. If Lazarus spoke, he would have called for
repentance of the rich from poor, seeking reparations from rich to poor. so
that the world would become a better place to live. If Lazarus spoke, he would have affirmed in
the continuation of God’s revelation in the activity of the life and death of
Jesus Christ, who was sent back to life by God in resurrection. If Lazarus
spoke, he would have said that he died while he was still living, and is still
living while he was dead. When Lazarus
speaks, the divine is located in his voice, for in the speech of the subalterns,
echoes the voice of the divine. Those that have ears, let them listen.
Rajbharat Patta,
24th September 2016
(Sermon to be preached at St. Ninians URC Church, Manchester)
4 comments:
Yes subaltern hermeneutics is a call to see the episode through the voice of the silenced.
If you were to write the parable in the first person of Lazarus how would you have done it?
Brilliant effort as always Raj
Thank you very much Vinod achen.
Dear Raj Patta,
Very inspiring post indeed. But according to me nobody except God can define who I am or what I am. Just because a person says he's great, doesn't make him great. Or if he points a finger at someone and says he's lesser than me, doesn't make that other person any lesser. Everyone were made from dust and everyone returns to dust. Just because India has this philosophy that there are different sectors, it is completely nonsensical to those outside of India.
But all said and done, within India, this is a real issue. But it applies only when the person involved starts to accept and believe it.
But when calamity strikes, it strikes unsparingly. Doesn't strike just the less fortunate. But in india , unfortunately people are not smart enough to understand that.
Sometimes I believe that there is no hope for India, with so many factors influencing a persons worth or very existence like corruption, gender discrimination, caste discrimination, colour, language etc etc.
And that very factors are detrimental to the growth and success of the country.
Only hope for India or any other society is Christ.
Priya
Some one should stand on behalf of the voice less ppl Church has that responsibility very nice devotion Anna Thanks for sharing
Post a Comment